CO129-287 - Public Offices & Others - 1898 — Page 450

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

This Document is the Property of ner Dis

AFFAIRS

CHINA.

C

CONFIDENTIAL.

No. 1.

C.0.

26117ovember 14.}

RECR & SHOTION 2. Rege 22 NOV 98

Sir C. MacDonald to the Marquess of Salisbury,-(Received November 14.)

441

Peking, September 21, 1898.

(No. 193.) My Lord,

I HAVE the honour to inclose herewith translation of a despatch dated the 10th instant, which I have received from the Tsung-li Yamên, supporting a proposal of the Governor-General of Canton to make Regulations for the lease of the Hong Kong extension.

I forward also copy of my reply of to-day's date, pointing out the gratuitous interference of the Governor-General in a matter already arranged between Ber Majesty's Government and China.

I have, &c.

(Signed) CLAUDE M. MACDONALD.

Inclosure 1 it No.1

in

(Translation.)

Tsung-li Yamén to Sir C. MacDonald.

Peking, September 10, 1898. ON the 4th September Yamên received the following communication from the Viceroy of Canton :-

"I am in receipt of the Yamên's despatch, stating the agreement come to in connection with the British proposals for an extension, under lease, of the Colony of Hong Kong, and inclosing a copy of the map appended to the original Memorial to the throne.

"I observed that the British Minister, Sir C. MacDonald, says that the extension is for the defence and protection of Hong Kong. Hong Kong lies very near to the province of Kwangtung, and alarm in this colony would mean uneasiness in the province. China has therefore no objection to offer against anything that makes for the defence and protection of Hong Kong, and cannot but assist any means of the sort strenuously. The important questions involved in this matter referring to the non-removal of officials and offices, the retention of jetties, the planning beforehand of railways, the free movement of war vessels, and the non-confiscation of property, has all been arranged by the Yamên, and need not be discussed again; but after close consideration four other points occur to me.

"1. The Yamên's Memorial to the throne speaks of 'tsu chang' (conditions of lease), and tsu chich' (the Chinese usually employed for 'concession' or 'settle. ment'). In the foreign text the extension should therefore be called a 'settlement."

"2. As official Yamêns are not to be removed, the custom-houses should also remain as before. This will accord with the promise in the original Agreement to lend every assistance in Customs matters. If the five custom-houses must all be removed beyond the limits of the extension, the Commissioner of Customs says that there will be a great extent of sea, without a commanding station, entailing heavy expenses in surveillance by revenue-cruisers. Further smuggling will be facilitated, and the yearly loss to the revenue will amount to a million and some hundreds of thousands of taels. The sole concern of the custom-house in the Settlement, being the collection of duty, British interests will not be prejudicially affected. Moreover, as the Commissioner will constantly employ steamers and cruisers, the protection and defence of Hong Kong will be all the more fully provided for.

"3. Land in the new Settlement belonging to Chinese subjects should pay the usual land tax to the Chinese authorities. If this is all levied by Great Britain, then a rent must be calculated, the amount of which need not be considered now.

"4. There is a great extent of sea included in the new Settlement. Setting aside the territorial waters of Hong Kong, which, being British territory, Chinese Govern-

[1728 -2]

Page 450Page 451

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.